⚖️ Trump pushes for grid expansion

In partnership with

The Federal Push for Data Center-Funded Grid Expansion

The Trump administration, through the newly formed National Energy Dominance Council, significantly escalated its pressure on the PJM Interconnection grid operator this week by issuing a "Statement of Principles" alongside thirteen state governors. This initiative, announced on January 16, 2026, calls for a one-time emergency auction to be held by September to secure fifteen billion dollars in new "baseload" power generation, specifically targeting natural gas and nuclear projects. The core of the proposal is a directive that would require data center operators to sign fifteen-year contracts to fund this new capacity, ensuring they pay for the generation regardless of whether they actually use the power. This move is designed to decouple the massive energy needs of the AI industry from the residential grid, shielding families in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest from record-breaking capacity price hikes that have already seen consumer bills rise by over twenty percent in early 2026.

Shifting the Cost of Infrastructure to the Private Sector

From a founder's perspective, this policy represents a pivot toward "beneficiary-based" infrastructure funding that could fundamentally alter the unit economics of hosting AI infrastructure in the United States. Traditionally, grid expansion was a regulated utility expense socialized across all ratepayers, but this new framework treats data center operators as a separate class of industrial users responsible for their own capital expenditures. This "pay-to-play" model creates a significant barrier to entry for mid-sized startups and specialized cloud providers who may not have the multi-billion-dollar balance sheets required to underwrite fifteen-year revenue guarantees. By forcing tech companies to absorb the financial risk of potential "stranded assets," the government is shifting the volatility of the energy market onto the technology sector’s growth margins, potentially slowing the deployment of new AI hardware while PJM and the administration battle over the jurisdictional legality of these emergency mandates.

Strategies for Managing Energy Liability and Grid Uncertainty

To navigate this new reality, founders should immediately assess their long-term exposure to the PJM region and consider diversifying their physical infrastructure into states with more traditional utility regulations or emerging "energy dominance" zones. If your startup is directly involved in building or leasing data center space, you must anticipate that "curtailable" power agreements—where your servers are the first to be shut down during a grid emergency—will become the default way to avoid these massive fifteen-year financial liabilities. I recommend that infrastructure-heavy startups explore "co-location" arrangements where they build directly alongside existing power plants, as a recent FERC order has paved the way for these setups to bypass some of the grid’s most expensive interconnection hurdles. Ultimately, the best defense against this regulatory shift is to decouple your operations from the centralized grid by investing in modular, on-site energy solutions like solar-plus-storage or hydrogen fuel cells that allow you to scale your computing power without being forced to bankroll the entire regional utility system.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more