⚖️ Trump fails to block state AI laws

In partnership with

Federal Preemption of State AI Laws Fails Again

The bid to federally block U.S. states from enacting their own artificial intelligence regulations has been defeated for the second time this year, most recently being stripped from the annual defence bill. Proponents of the ban, including some congressional Republicans, the White House, and a robust cohort of Silicon Valley tech giants, argue that a "patchwork" of 50 different state laws would create an unworkable compliance burden, stifle innovation, and harm U.S. competitiveness against rivals like China. They pushed for a single, unified federal standard. However, the proposal faced strong bipartisan resistance in Congress. Critics, including many state lawmakers and consumer advocates, contend that state-level regulation is necessary to establish safety, transparency, and consumer protection guardrails for AI in the absence of comprehensive federal action, and that blocking states would simply grant Big Tech an unregulated environment.

The Inevitable Rise of State-by-State AI Rules

This congressional failure signals an apparent reality for AI startups: the “patchwork” of state and local AI regulation is not going away; it is accelerating. The argument that state laws inhibit innovation often conflates the interests of Big Tech incumbents—who have the capital and legal teams to comply with national requirements—with the needs of startups. While a single federal rule would simplify compliance for everyone, the continuing legislative void at the federal level means states are filling the gap to address local concerns, particularly around algorithmic discrimination, employment screening, deepfakes, and consumer transparency. Founders must stop hoping for federal preemption to save them from a messy landscape and instead recognize that state laws, such as those emerging from California, Colorado, and New York, are now the de facto regulatory floor.

Build a Future-Proof Compliance Strategy

For founders, the failure of federal preemption is a call to action: compliance cannot be an afterthought. While Big Tech can afford to lobby heavily and manage 50 different legal strategies, startups must be nimble. Your immediate strategy should mirror how successful companies navigate existing state-level regulations, such as data privacy (CCPA, etc.) and employment law. First, identify high-risk areas where your AI is used (e.g., hiring, lending, or healthcare) as these are the primary targets of state legislation. Second, “standardize up” by adopting the strictest requirement from any major jurisdiction (e.g., New York City’s bias audit rules or Colorado’s transparency mandates) and applying that as your baseline national policy. This approach minimizes complexity by avoiding 50 custom builds. Finally, document your AI governance process rigorously. Documentation is your best legal defense against claims of negligence, demonstrating that you have a proactive, good-faith effort to mitigate harm.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more