- Law4Startups
- Posts
- ⚖️ Trump EPA cancels grants wrongly
⚖️ Trump EPA cancels grants wrongly
Federal Appeals Court Blocks Executive Clawback of Disbursed $20B Clean Energy Grants
A 6-4 en banc ruling from the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reinstated a preliminary injunction blocking the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from seizing nearly $20 billion USD in Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) climate funds. In February 2025, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, acting alongside the Department of the Treasury and the FBI, directed Citibank to freeze the commercial accounts of eight nonprofit awardees managing the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF). The Trump administration argued that subsequent legislative action under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) repealed the IRA's statutory underlying authorization, empowering the executive branch to claw back unspent grant capital. However, the appellate court ruled that because the funds were legally obligated and disbursed into private accounts prior to statutory repeal, the executive branch could not retroactively execute an administrative clawback based "solely on a policy disagreement" with prior congressional appropriations.
Appropriations Property Rights, Tucker Act Jurisdiction, and Anti-Retroactivity
This decision establishes a crucial administrative and constitutional precedent regarding the legal boundary between unspent agency appropriations and fully obligated, disbursed capital. From a legal doctrine perspective, the D.C. Circuit rejected the Department of Justice's argument that the dispute fell strictly under government contract jurisdiction (the Tucker Act) in the Court of Federal Claims. Instead, the court treated the EPA's account freezes as potential Administrative Procedure Act (APA) violations and unlawful property interference. The ruling highlights that once federal grant funds leave the Treasury and vest in a recipient's designated commercial bank account under valid statutory authority, subsequent statutory repeals cannot be applied retroactively to compel account forfeitures without distinct statutory language and constitutional due process.
In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more