⚖️ TikTok Ban Update and Why it Matters for Startups

In partnership with

Overview of TikTok Ban and Potential Reversal

With the federal government threatening a U.S. ban on TikTok by early 2025, the social media giant’s future is in question. President Biden signed legislation in April requiring ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese parent company, to divest its U.S. interests. If ByteDance fails to complete a sale by January 19, 2025, TikTok will be banned—though a 90-day extension could push the decision into the hands of the incoming administration. President-elect Donald Trump, who previously advocated for a ban on TikTok over national security concerns, has recently signaled opposition to such a ban, suggesting a shift in approach that would spare the platform from this regulatory action.

Beat Black Friday with BILL

Get the deal of the year for you and your business when you choose the BILL Divvy Card + expense management software, AND an exclusive gift when you take a demo. Move over, Black Friday.

Choose BILL Spend & Expense to help your business:

• Reap rewards with reliable cash back rates

• Create virtual cards that help protect from fraud & overspending

• Control spending with customizable budget controls

Take a demo by the end of the month and take home a Nintendo Switch, Apple AirPods Pro, Samsung 50" TV, or Xbox Series S—your choice¹ .

Request a demo

¹ Terms and Conditions apply. See offer page for more details.
BILL Divvy Card is issued by Cross River Bank, Member FDIC, and is not a deposit product.

Impact of National Security Concerns on Foreign Ownership in Tech

The original calls to ban TikTok arose from concerns about the potential for the Chinese Communist Party to access American users' data. While ByteDance has denied sharing data with the Chinese government, bipartisan concerns over data security have kept the company under scrutiny. Trump’s renewed stance, however, reflects another dimension: reducing the market power of competitors like Meta. Nonetheless, the debate around TikTok raises broader issues about national security, data privacy, and the acceptable extent of foreign ownership in companies that hold sensitive user data. With growing bipartisan alignment on foreign ownership restrictions in tech, U.S.-based companies may face more scrutiny if their parent companies are based in countries considered potential adversaries.

Why This Matters to U.S. Startups and Investors

For U.S. startups and their founders, a TikTok ban could set a precedent with lasting implications for foreign investments in American tech companies. A ban based on foreign ownership alone would signal a strong stance against outside influence in the U.S. tech sector, potentially making the U.S. less attractive to foreign investors. This could limit capital flows not only from China but also from other nations that play a significant role in U.S. venture capital, including South Korea, Japan and Saudi Arabia. Limiting foreign investments in U.S. tech would reduce the pool of available funding for startups, particularly for high-growth sectors reliant on international capital. This precedent may encourage other nations to impose similar restrictions, creating a less globalized venture landscape with fewer funding opportunities for startups in the U.S. and abroad.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more

Newsletter supported by:

Seeking impartial news? Meet 1440.

Every day, 3.5 million readers turn to 1440 for their factual news. We sift through 100+ sources to bring you a complete summary of politics, global events, business, and culture, all in a brief 5-minute email. Enjoy an impartial news experience.

Join for free today!

and by: