⚖️ The FTC’s Zero-Tolerance Stance on Junk Fees

In partnership with

StubHub Settlement

Last Thursday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) finalized a $10 million settlement with StubHub over allegations that the platform failed to provide clear, upfront ticket pricing. This enforcement action stems from the FTC’s "Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees," which went into effect on May 12, 2025, specifically targeting the live-event ticketing and short-term lodging sectors. The FTC alleged that StubHub "slow-walked" its compliance during a critical 99th-percentile traffic event—the release of the NFL regular-season schedule—deciding that the competitive advantage of displaying lower, fee-exclusive prices outweighed the risk of regulatory penalties. Although the period of non-compliance lasted only three days, the $10 million fine is intended to strip the company of its "ill-gotten" profits and provide refunds to affected consumers. This case serves as the first major test of the new rule, signalling that federal regulators are prioritizing immediate, total-price transparency across all digital marketplaces.

Why the "Wait and See" Strategy is Now Terminal

For startup founders, the StubHub settlement is a definitive warning that "incremental rollouts" of legal compliance can lead to catastrophic financial and reputational damage. The FTC demonstrated that it will no longer grant "grace periods" for major regulatory shifts, especially when a company’s internal data suggests a deliberate choice to delay compliance for commercial gain. Founders must recognize that the "Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees" requires the total price—inclusive of all mandatory fees but excluding taxes and shipping—to be the most prominent figure displayed from the very first interaction. In the current 2026 enforcement environment, the FTC is actively monitoring "high-traffic" windows and using them as benchmarks for intent; if your platform experiences a surge in activity while failing to meet transparency standards, regulators may interpret the delay as a bad-faith attempt to capture market share. This shift from complaint-driven to proactive, data-informed enforcement means that even a 72-hour lapse in compliance can trigger multi-million dollar liabilities.

Architecting for Transparency to Mitigate Enforcement Risk

To safeguard your business, you must move away from "drip pricing" and ensure that your engineering and marketing teams are aligned on a "Total Price First" architecture. Practically, this means auditing your UI/UX to ensure that mandatory service, processing, or "convenience" fees are integrated into the primary price display rather than being relegated to a secondary screen or a hover-over tooltip. If your startup operates in a sector currently under the FTC’s microscope—such as event ticketing, hospitality, or the recently added rental housing category—you should implement automated compliance checks that verify price displays across different regions and device types. It is also vital to maintain a "compliance log" that documents your transition efforts, which can serve as critical evidence of good faith if a technical glitch occurs during a rollout. By prioritizing clarity as a core product feature rather than a legal burden, you can avoid the "bait-and-switch" trap and build long-term trust with a consumer base that is increasingly empowered by federal oversight.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more