⚖️ Sachs under scrutiny

In partnership with

Scrutiny Mounts Over David Sacks’ Dual Roles in Politics and Tech

A New York Times investigation has raised questions about potential conflicts of interest surrounding David Sacks, who serves as President Donald Trump’s AI and crypto czar while holding extensive private investments in both sectors. The NYT reports that Sacks has 708 tech investments—449 of which are AI companies that could benefit from the policies he is shaping. Critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, have previously argued that his political influence and investment portfolio pose an “explicit conflict of interest.” Although Sacks has received White House ethics waivers and claims to have divested from required assets, the NYT notes that his public filings do not disclose the current value of his remaining holdings or timelines for divestment. Sacks has pushed back strongly, calling the story a “nothing burger” and alleging that the reporting was guided by a predetermined narrative.

Ethics Waivers, Policy Influence, and the New Shape of Tech Governance

This controversy highlights the increasingly blurred line between private sector influence and public-sector policymaking in emerging technologies like AI and crypto. Ethics waivers are not unusual for special government employees, but the scale of Sacks’ overlapping interests—combined with his proximity to major industry figures such as Nvidia’s Jensen Huang—raises difficult questions about governance, transparency, and trust. For founders, the reporting underscores how AI and crypto policy is being shaped not only by regulators and legislators but also by investors and operators deeply embedded in the ecosystem. When a policymaker is connected to hundreds of startups, even well-intentioned decisions can create the perception of favoritism, which risks undermining faith in regulatory processes. As global scrutiny around tech governance intensifies, these dynamics may lead to stricter ethical rules or more aggressive disclosure requirements.

Navigating Policy Environments Shaped by Power Players

For startup founders, especially in AI and crypto, this situation is a reminder that policy landscapes are influenced by individuals who often straddle public and private roles. This can create both unpredictability and opportunity. On one hand, shifting regulations—particularly those shaped by influential insiders—can rapidly alter market conditions, access to compute, compliance requirements, or token-related rules. On the other hand, heightened scrutiny of conflicts of interest may push governments to adopt more transparent processes, which could ultimately benefit early-stage companies seeking clarity and fairness. Startups should closely monitor evolving federal ethics policies, diversify their regulatory exposure across jurisdictions, and prepare for increased compliance expectations. Most importantly, founders should build resilient strategies that do not rely on preferential access or political alignment—because when political winds shift, those depending on insider advantages are the first to face risk.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more