⚖️ Political Speech and Immigration Enforcement

In partnership with

The Deportation Attempt of CCDH CEO Imran Ahmed

In a high-stakes escalation of the "censorship industrial complex" debate, the Trump administration recently moved to deport Imran Ahmed, the CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH). Ahmed, a lawful permanent resident (Green Card holder) originally from the UK, was one of five European researchers and regulators, including former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton, targeted by the State Department for allegedly "coercing" U.S. platforms into censoring American viewpoints. Secretary of State Marco Rubio characterized Ahmed as a "radical activist" whose work on online abuse and disinformation warrants removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act’s (INA) foreign policy grounds. However, on December 25, 2025, a federal judge in New York issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), halting any arrest or deportation. The judge noted that the administration's use of 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(4)(C) to expel a Green Card holder for research and advocacy likely violates the First and Fifth Amendments.

The Politicization of Platform Governance

For tech founders, this case is a flashing red light regarding the politicization of "Trust and Safety" (T&S) work. The administration is effectively redefining content moderation and misinformation research as a form of "foreign interference" or "censorship" that can trigger immigration consequences. This creates a precarious environment for startups that employ non-citizen experts in compliance, moderation, or algorithmic auditing. If your company relies on researchers who have a public digital footprint criticizing domestic political speech or advocating for stricter platform regulations, those employees now face personal legal risk. This case also highlights the continuing legal fallout from Elon Musk’s X, which previously sued CCDH for its research; although that case was dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP law, the pending appeal and the administration's current stance suggest that litigation is being used as a precursor to federal enforcement actions against industry critics.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more