⚖️ Offshore Wind Litigation

In partnership with

The Federal Halt and the $25 Billion Offshore Wind Litigation

The Department of the Interior’s December 22 decision to halt five major offshore wind projects has triggered a massive legal confrontation between the Trump administration and some of the world's largest energy developers. Citing national security concerns—specifically the potential for wind turbines to interfere with military and aviation radar—the administration paused projects totaling 6 gigawatts of capacity, including several that are already between 60% and 90% complete. In response, developers Ørsted, Equinor, and Dominion Energy have filed lawsuits to protect their combined $25 billion investment, with Dominion reporting daily losses of five million dollars due to the work stoppage. While the administration points to the technical challenges whirling turbine blades pose to radar systems, the developers argue that established mitigation strategies and adaptive processing algorithms already exist to address these concerns, making the sudden halt an unprecedented disruption to the American energy infrastructure.

National Security as a Tool for Drastic Regulatory Intervention

For startup founders, this dispute serves as a stark reminder of how "national security" can be invoked as a powerful, and often unpredictable, regulatory lever to disrupt even the most capital-intensive industries. The analysis of this case reveals a significant gap between technical feasibility and political reality; although the Department of Energy previously identified solutions to radar interference, those solutions did not prevent the executive branch from exercising its authority to pause operations. This situation highlights a fundamental risk for any venture operating at the intersection of public infrastructure, federal land, or defense-adjacent technology. It demonstrates that having a "proven" technical solution is often secondary to the political climate, and that massive sunk costs do not provide a guaranteed shield against sudden shifts in federal policy or executive priorities.

Practical Advice for Managing High-Stakes Regulatory and Operational Risk

The immediate impact of this halt underscores the necessity for founders in hardware, infrastructure, or highly regulated sectors to build extreme resilience into their legal and financial structures. To protect your business, you must ensure that your contracts include robust "change in law" and "government interference" clauses that account for the possibility of sudden federal halts, as the financial burn in these scenarios is catastrophic. You should also adopt a strategy of proactive "de-conflicting" by engaging with relevant federal agencies—such as the Pentagon or the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management—years before your project reaches maturity to establish a documented history of compliance and cooperation. My advice is to maintain an aggressive litigation fund and a ready-to-deploy judicial strategy, as the successful court-ordered restarts seen in previous wind projects suggest that the judiciary remains a critical check on executive overreach.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more