⚖️ Google antitrust penalty

In partnership with

German Court Orders Google to Pay Millions for Market Abuse

A German court has ruled that Google abused its dominant position in the price comparison market, ordering the company to pay a combined €572 million ($665.6 million) to two German price comparison platforms, Idealo and Producto. The decision stems from claims that Google unfairly favored its own shopping comparison service—an issue echoed in a 2024 European Court of Justice ruling that fined the company $2.7 billion for self-preferencing. Idealo, which had sought €3.3 billion in damages, announced that it plans to continue pursuing the full amount despite the partial award. Google maintains that it corrected its practices in 2017 and now offers competitors equal access, but the company intends to appeal the judgment.

Self-Preferencing, Antitrust Pressure, and Platform Power

The ruling reinforces a growing trend: regulators across the EU are increasingly unwilling to tolerate platform self-preferencing, especially by dominant gatekeepers like Google. For founders, this underscores how the competitive landscape can be shaped not just by technology, but by regulation and market power. Google’s argument—that its “Shopping Unit” remedy expanded competition—highlights how dominant platforms attempt to frame compliance as innovation, while affected rivals argue that structural advantages persist. The fact that Idealo is still pressing for billions more signals how antitrust cases are becoming multi-stage battles rather than one-off fines. And with the EU simultaneously investigating Google’s spam policy and recently issuing a nearly €3 billion fine for advertising-related abuses, it’s clear that European regulators view digital market fairness as a top priority.

Competing in Markets Controlled by Gatekeepers

For startups, especially those building search-adjacent tools, ecommerce platforms, or products reliant on discoverability, this case is a critical reminder that platform dependence is a double-edged sword. While dominant platforms provide distribution, they can also reshape rankings, pricing, and access in ways that crush smaller competitors. Founders should build multi-channel acquisition strategies early—don’t rely solely on Google search or any single aggregator for customer traffic. If your startup competes with or builds on top of a major platform, document any discriminatory treatment and monitor evolving EU and local competition rules, which may offer new avenues for recourse. Finally, anticipate regulatory shifts when designing your business model: markets dominated by gatekeepers are becoming increasingly regulated, and savvy startups can gain an advantage by aligning with—rather than scrambling to adapt to—emerging compliance expectations.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more