⚖️ Fisker's Legal Issues

Author

Liam Gill
October 24, 2024

In partnership with

Overview of Fisker's Recall and Bankruptcy Case

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has flagged Fisker's bankruptcy plan, particularly objecting to its proposal that vehicle owners cover labor costs for recall repairs. Fisker, the bankrupt EV startup, had initially announced that customers would need to pay for repairs related to two recalls involving faulty door handles and a malfunctioning water pump. While the company reversed this decision, it later reverted to the idea, proposing to set aside funds for parts but not labor. According to the DOJ, this scheme violates the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, which mandates that manufacturers must cover all costs of recall repairs.

Get your news where Silicon Valley gets its news 📰

The best investors need the information that matters, fast.

That’s why a lot of them (including investors from a16z, Bessemer, Founders Fund, and Sequoia) trust this free newsletter.

It’s a five minute-read every morning, and it gives readers the information they need ASAP so they can spend less time scrolling and more time doing.

Legal Implications for Startups in Bankruptcy

For startups navigating bankruptcy, especially those in the EV and tech industries, Fisker's case underscores the importance of compliance with federal safety laws, even during financial insolvency. The DOJ's objection makes it clear that filing for bankruptcy does not exempt a company from its legal obligations under safety regulations, as outlined in the Safety Act. Any attempt to shift recall costs to consumers could lead to legal challenges, making it critical for startups to have a robust plan for addressing regulatory requirements during liquidation or restructuring.

Key Takeaways for Founders

Tech and automotive startups must ensure that recall-related costs are fully addressed in any financial plan, particularly in bankruptcy cases. Fisker's case illustrates how failing to adhere to regulatory obligations can lead to additional legal scrutiny, complicating an already difficult financial situation. Startups facing similar challenges should prioritize compliance with safety and consumer protection laws, as failure to do so can result in costly delays, legal battles, and reputational damage.

Escaping AI POC purgatory: Techniques for enterprise AI engineers

Many companies struggle to move generative AI from experimentation to production.

Join us Oct. 29 at 9am PT. Sam Julien, Writer's Director of Developer Relations, will share practical strategies to overcome enterprise AI engineering challenges using a full-stack approach.

Topics include:

  • Managing project scope

  • Improving accuracy with domain-specific models & graph-based RAG

  • Navigating AI application development

  • Can’t make it live? Register anyway and we’ll send you the recording.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more

Newsletter supported by:

Hire Ava, the AI SDR & Get Meetings on Autopilot

Ava automates your entire outbound demand generation process, including:

  • Intent-Driven Lead Discovery

  • High Quality Emails with Waterfall Personalization

  • Follow-Up Management

Free up your sales team to focus on high-value interactions and closing deals, while Ava handles the time-consuming tasks.