⚖️ Feds could ban State AI regulations

Lawmakers Debate 10-Year Ban on State AI Regulation

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and allies are pushing to include a sweeping 10-year ban on state and local AI regulation in the GOP’s budget reconciliation bill, aiming to prevent a “patchwork” of state-level AI laws. The provision, backed by OpenAI, Anduril, and a16z, would prohibit states from regulating AI models and systems — including those already deployed in hiring, housing, healthcare, elections, and more — in exchange for access to federal broadband funds. But opposition is mounting: Democrats, labour groups, AI safety experts, and even some Republicans (including Sens. Hawley and Blackburn) argue it undermines consumer protections, state autonomy, and accountability in the absence of strong federal AI laws. The Senate could vote on the bill as early as Saturday.

“Patchwork” Fears May Be Overblown — and Strategically Convenient

Backers of the moratorium claim that differing state laws would stifle AI progress and give China the upper hand, a narrative that’s gaining traction in Washington. However, critics argue that corporations already navigate state-by-state regulations across various industries. Most existing state AI laws aren’t sweeping; they target tangible risks, such as deepfakes, bias, fraud, and a lack of transparency in sensitive domains. Many of these laws overlap, not conflict. The broader concern is that this preemption tactic would allow powerful AI companies to avoid oversight for a decade, at a time when trust in both the industry and Congress to self-regulate is low.

Watch This Closely — Even If You’re Not Directly Affected (Yet)

If your startup isn't developing foundation models, this moratorium may not immediately change your work, but it reshapes the regulatory playing field. If passed, the federal government would sideline states from experimenting with guardrails, thereby delaying the implementation of more explicit rules for everyone. That uncertainty could make enterprise clients more cautious and investor due diligence more intense. Founders building in AI or deploying AI tools should plan for compliance across jurisdictions and be prepared to engage with upcoming transparency standards, even if they are voluntary for now. In the meantime, the fight over “who gets to regulate AI” is far from over, and founders should track it like they would major changes to tax or privacy law.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more

Newsletter supported by:

Seeking impartial news? Meet 1440.

Every day, 3.5 million readers turn to 1440 for their factual news. We sift through 100+ sources to bring you a complete summary of politics, global events, business, and culture, all in a brief 5-minute email. Enjoy an impartial news experience.

Join for free today!