⚖️ Federal Judge Blocks California AI Bill

AB 2839 and the Fight Against Election Deepfakes

In a recent legal showdown, a federal judge temporarily blocked California’s newly passed AI law, AB 2839, which was designed to crack down on election-related deepfakes. Signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, the law aimed to hold individuals responsible for distributing AI-generated political content intended to deceive voters, specifically targeting creators rather than social media platforms. However, this legislation was quickly challenged on constitutional grounds by Christopher Kohls, an X (formerly Twitter) user, after he was called out for posting a deepfake of Vice President Kamala Harris. Kohls argued that the deepfake was satire and should be protected by the First Amendment. A federal judge agreed, issuing an injunction that temporarily blocks the enforcement of the law, citing concerns about free speech and the broad scope of the legislation.

Beat Black Friday with BILL

Take a demo of BILL Spend & Expense by the end of the month to see why so many businesses choose BILL to streamline their finances.

Then choose your exclusive gift—a Nintendo Switch, Apple AirPods Pro, Samsung 50" TV, or Xbox Series S—and show Black Friday who's boss¹ .

Request a demo

¹ Terms and Conditions apply. See offer page for more details.
BILL Divvy Card is issued by Cross River Bank, Member FDIC, and is not a deposit product.

The Legal Ruling and Free Speech Concerns

Judge John Mendez's decision to block AB 2839 hinged on First Amendment protections, stating that the law’s vague wording could unjustly infringe upon free speech rights. Mendez highlighted that while AI deepfakes could pose a legitimate threat to election integrity, the law risked overreaching by restricting political satire, parody, and critique. He pointed out that California’s broad definition of harmful content could target individuals who had no intention of misleading voters, chilling constitutionally protected speech. The ruling underscores the challenge of balancing the regulation of AI-generated content with safeguarding fundamental freedoms, especially in an era where digital media serves as a modern platform for political expression.

Augment Your Sales Team With AI Agent Frank

• Fully automated prospecting, outreach and meeting bookings

• Customizable to suit your business’s needs

• Learns using your files and data for the most accuracy

Learn More

Implications for Tech Startups and AI Regulation

For tech startups operating in the AI space, this case represents a key legal precedent regarding the regulation of AI-generated content. It signals the growing scrutiny around how AI tools are used to create political or potentially harmful content and the legal frameworks that will shape their future. Startups focused on AI development, especially those involved in content creation or distribution, will need to keep a close eye on evolving legislation to ensure compliance with any new laws that govern AI use. The decision also serves as a reminder that tech companies working in politically sensitive areas should be prepared for legal challenges related to free speech, as this ruling may influence future AI regulations nationwide.

Free Daily Trade Alerts: Expert Insights at Your Fingertips

• Master the market in 5 minutes per day

• Hot stock alerts sent directly to your phone

• 150,000+ active subscribers and growing fast!

Free Access Here

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more

Newsletter supported by: