⚖️ Courts support off-shore wind

In partnership with

Judicial Reversal of Federal Offshore Wind Halts

The Trump administration faced significant legal defeats this week as federal judges authorized the resumption of construction for several major East Coast offshore wind projects. The Department of the Interior had previously issued ninety-day stop-work orders for five projects totalling six gigawatts, citing unspecified national security risks related to radar interference. However, judges in Virginia and Washington, D.C., including Trump appointee Carl Nichols, expressed skepticism toward the government’s justifications, noting that the administration failed to adequately defend against claims that the orders were arbitrary and capricious. While Revolution Wind, Empire Wind, and Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind have been cleared to restart, other projects like Sunrise Wind and Vineyard Wind 1 remain in litigation pending upcoming hearings in February 2026.

The Erosion of Executive Overreach in Infrastructure Projects

For startup founders, this judicial pushback provides a crucial lesson in the durability of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) against sudden executive policy shifts. The courts’ focus on the arbitrary and capricious standard highlights that even when a president cites national security, the government must still provide a reasoned, evidence-based connection between the alleged risk and the regulatory action taken. This is particularly relevant for founders in the energy and data infrastructure sectors, as it demonstrates that existing technical solutions—such as adaptive radar filtering—can serve as a powerful legal defence against attempts to halt innovation. The judges’ questioning of why construction was stopped for an operational concern suggests that courts are becoming increasingly wary of overly broad federal mandates that stifle capital-intensive development without specific, localized evidence of harm.

Energy Volatility and Proactive Legal Defence for Infrastructure Founders

The resumption of these wind projects is vital for the tech ecosystem, as these facilities are positioned to provide cheap, renewable power to high-demand regions like the Northeast and the Mid-Atlantic’s data center corridors. Founders whose business models rely on stable, low-cost electricity or high-uptime infrastructure should view these legal victories as a signal to continue investing in the green transition despite federal headwinds. My practical advice for founders facing similar regulatory halts is to immediately challenge the procedural validity of the order rather than just the policy intent, as procedural errors are often the fastest path to a judicial stay. You must also ensure that your long-term energy procurement strategies account for the potential delays inherent in federal litigation, potentially by incorporating regulatory delay clauses into your power purchase agreements to protect your bottom line from political volatility.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more