⚖️ California limiting AI for children

In partnership with

California’s Proposed Four-Year Moratorium on AI-Integrated Toys

California Senator Steve Padilla has introduced Senate Bill 867, an ambitious bill that seeks to impose a four-year ban on the manufacture and sale of toys featuring AI chatbot capabilities for children and adolescents under 18. This bill is a direct response to a series of harrowing incidents over the past year, including high-profile lawsuits involving minors who died by suicide after forming emotional attachments to companion chatbots. Legislative concern has been further fueled by reports from advocacy groups like the PIRG Education Fund, which demonstrated that current AI toys can be easily manipulated into discussing dangerous or sexually explicit topics. Despite President Trump’s recent executive order aimed at curbing state-level AI regulations, the order explicitly preserves the right of states to enact laws concerning child safety, providing SB 867 with a unique degree of political and legal protection. This legislative "pause" is intended to give the California Privacy Protection Agency and other regulators sufficient time to develop a comprehensive safety framework before the technology becomes a permanent fixture in the toy industry.

Strategic Analysis of the Transition from Regulation to Prohibition

For founders in the EdTech and consumer electronics space, SB 867 represents a significant escalation in regulatory strategy, shifting from the "disclosure and safeguard" model of previous laws like SB 243 toward an outright market moratorium. While SB 243 already mandates that chatbot operators implement crisis protocols and age-appropriate filters, the introduction of SB 867 suggests that California lawmakers no longer believe that reactive safeguards are sufficient for physical products marketed specifically to children. This shift highlights a growing legal consensus that AI companions pose a unique psychological risk compared to traditional software, primarily due to the "anthropomorphic effect" where children struggle to distinguish between a programmed response and a sentient entity. The fact that industry giants like Mattel and OpenAI have already delayed their anticipated 2025 AI product launches underscores the immense litigation risk associated with this sector. Founders must recognize that the "move fast and break things" philosophy is effectively dead in the youth market, as any perceived failure in safety is now being met with permanent legislative blocks rather than simple fines.

Navigating the Moratorium and Future-Proofing Youth-Facing AI

The immediate impact of SB 867 is the potential closure of the California market for any startup developing interactive, open-ended conversational hardware for minors. To navigate this, founders should consider pivoting their product development away from unpredictable large language models and toward "structured AI" environments that utilize pre-validated, branching dialogue trees which do not allow for unscripted generative responses. It is also critical to begin meticulously documenting your "Safety by Design" architecture, including every iteration of your content filtering and red-teaming processes, to prepare for the inevitable rigorous auditing that will be required once the moratorium is lifted. Furthermore, you should closely monitor the enforcement of the private right of action established in earlier legislation, as this will serve as the financial blueprint for how future AI toy litigation will be structured. My advice is to diversify your geographic footprint while simultaneously investing in "Artificial Integrity" standards that exceed current legal requirements, ensuring that your product remains viable if or when federal standards eventually supersede these state bans.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more