- Law4Startups
- Posts
- ⚖️ Microsoft stop using Chinese engineers on DoD projects
⚖️ Microsoft stop using Chinese engineers on DoD projects
Liam Gill
July 29, 2025
Microsoft Ends Use of China-Based Engineers on DoD Projects
Microsoft has announced it will no longer use engineers based in China to support U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) cloud computing projects, following a ProPublica report that exposed the company's prior practice of relying on foreign-based technical staff under the supervision of U.S. “digital escorts.” These escorts, tasked with monitoring sensitive system maintenance, were often underqualified to evaluate the technical actions of the engineers they were supervising. The revelation prompted backlash from national security officials, including a public rebuke from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who emphasized that no foreign engineers should have access to DoD systems. Microsoft quickly responded with a policy change, pledging that only domestic engineering teams will now handle these government workloads.
This gold miner, with a pre-money valuation of just C$15 million, is undertaking a C$2 million Pre-IPO equity raise to restart the Gold Road mine in Arizona, USA, aiming for production in the next five weeks. Idled since November 2021 when gold was $1,650 per ounce, the mine and mill are now primed to benefit from $3,300 gold and rising silver prices. Gold Road, Arizona's only fully permitted integrated gold mill, is set to list on the TSX.V this October. Building a similar mine today would cost close to US$100 million.
Management plans to grow production to 20,000 ounces of gold per year by 2025/26, potentially yielding over US$40 million EBITDA in 2026 and a healthy dividend paid in physical gold and silver. This low valuation offers near-term re-rating potential from strong cash flow, a public listing, and significant exploration upside. Learn more.*
A Wake-Up Call for Global Talent Models in Sensitive Sectors
This incident highlights the conflict between globally distributed tech teams and the increasingly strict demands of national security compliance. Large companies like Microsoft have historically depended on international talent to scale operations efficiently, but this case shows the limits of that model in government work. The fact that escorts lacked the technical expertise to monitor foreign engineers effectively reveals a regulatory blind spot. The backlash reflects growing concern from lawmakers and regulators about who can access critical infrastructure, regardless of company size or intent. It also demonstrates that even well-established compliance structures can fail under real-world scrutiny.
Review Your Compliance Practices Now
For startups working with public sector clients (especially in defence, healthcare, or infrastructure), this is a reminder that jurisdictional considerations matter deeply. If your company uses global engineering resources, now is the time to conduct a compliance audit, especially if you support sensitive or regulated industries. Ensure that your talent deployment doesn’t cross any national security red lines, and double-check whether your staff’s access to certain projects complies with all relevant export control and data sovereignty rules. If you plan to scale into defence or government contracting, invest early in a clean compliance foundation, because regulators won’t be forgiving later.
In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more