⚖️ Anthropic challenging DOD ruling

In partnership with

The First "Domestic Adversary": Anthropic vs. The Department of War

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei officially announced that the company will challenge the Department of War’s (DoW) "supply-chain risk" designation in federal court. This move follows an unprecedented week in which President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth labeled the San Francisco-based AI firm a national security threat—a designation typically reserved for foreign adversaries like Huawei. The conflict stems from Anthropic’s refusal to remove specific ethical blocks on mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous lethal weapons, with Hegseth declaring that "America’s warfighters will never be held hostage by the ideological whims of Big Tech.

Legal Strategy: Challenging "10 U.S.C. § 3252"

Amodei’s legal team is expected to argue that the Pentagon has fundamentally misapplied 10 U.S.C. § 3252, the statute governing supply-chain risk. Under this law, a designation requires a finding of "sabotage" or "malicious subversion" by an adversary—criteria that Anthropic argues do not apply to a domestic company transparently enforcing its publicly stated Terms of Service.

• Least Restrictive Means: Amodei argues that the law requires the Secretary to use the "least restrictive means" to protect the supply chain. He contends that a total ban on all military contractors doing business with Anthropic is a "punitive" overreach that exceeds the statute's intent.

• Narrow Scope: Anthropic maintains that the designation can legally only apply to work performed directly for the DoW. This is a critical distinction for Anthropic's survival, as it aims to protect its multi-billion dollar commercial partnerships with firms like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft that also happen to hold defense contracts.

• The Judicial Hurdle: Legal experts note that 10 U.S.C. § 3252 is designed to be highly discretionary and often bars traditional judicial review, meaning Anthropic may have to prove that the administration acted with "clear personal or political animus" rather than genuine security concerns.

In addition to our newsletter we offer 60+ free legal templates for companies in the UK, Canada and the US. These include employment contracts, investment agreements and more